Oct 05, · Liberty should apply to everyone with a few exceptions. First, liberty should only be granted to the extent in which this liberty does not harm another's liberty. This is known as the harm principle. People should be granted liberty however the right to liberty must stop when it hinders on someone else's well-being Short Essay on Liberty. Article shared by. Liberty is derived from the Latin word liber which means free. It is a word of negative meaning denoting absence of restraint. Its primary significance is to do what one likes, regardless of all consequences. But this is obviously blogger.comted Reading Time: 3 mins “On Liberty” is an essay composed by a man named J.S. Mill who talks about the different types of liberty given to individuals. The novel in divided up into five chapter stating different liberties or responsibilities that makes someone a responsible self
Essay on Liberty: Top 4 Essays | World | Political Science
Essay 1. Negatively speaking, liberty means absence of all restraints, while positively speaking, it on liberty essay freedom to do whatever one wants.
Thus in the second sense liberty is of the nature of licence, pure and simple. This type of liberty is not possible in a modern state, where everyone has to adjust himself to the fair play of freedom of all. In the first place, an individual in order to express his personality in thought, word and action wants freedom, i, on liberty essay.
In the second place liberty carries, with itself a kind of restraint on his own freedom for the sake of adjustment of similar freedom of others in the state, on liberty essay. Thus there are provisions for punishment in the criminal code for those who exceed the limits put on their freedom.
Essay 2. Liberty can be divided into five kinds — natural liberty, civil liberty, political liberty, economic liberty and national liberty. In modern states there cannot be any natural liberty, on liberty essay. This type of liberty might have existed in the pre-state stage of human civilisation.
According to Jean Jacques Rousseau, the people enjoyed natural liberty in the state of nature and men lost such liberty with the creation of the state. Natural liberty is an unlimited and unrestricted freedom. This concept of liberty is imaginary and cannot exist in a civilised society.
This type of liberty is actually license. Only the strong can enjoy the right in a jungle life. The weak on liberty essay be exploited. Might can be right in a jungle, on liberty essay, not in a civil community. So we reject the natural liberty as a bogus one. Civil liberty implies on liberty essay enjoyed by the people in a civil society. This type on liberty essay liberty emanates from the civil rights which include right to life, liberty and property, on liberty essay.
These are the basic civil amenities, without which a man, whether he is a citizen or an alien, cannot lead a civil life. It is also the bounden duty of the state to provide these opportunities to the individuals in the state. About civil liberty, R. Political liberty stands for the political rights to have a share in the government. Such political liberty is possible only in a democracy. The democratic on liberty essay of the state will be impossible if the state does not provide its citizens with political liberty.
Political liberty is identical with the constitutional liberty which means democratic rule. In order to make political liberty real, the citizens will have four political rights, which are discussed below:, on liberty essay. The citizens will have the right to vote on attaining majority to elect the legislature. In India the voting age is from 18 years. Almost all the democratic countries have granted this right to the citizens, since it is the most basic element in a democracy.
Not only the right to vote but also the right to stand as a candidate is another important political right in a democracy. The legislatures and all representative bodies must not be permanent. These institutions should be elected after some fixed time. In India the Lok Sabha which is the lower house of the parliament is elected after every five years. The citizens are to be given the right to elect a strong opposition to criticise the party in power.
The other method of criticism is freedom of speech, freedom of the press and freedom to assemble peacefully for demonstration against the government. Civil and political liberty will be meaningless without economic liberty. The state should see that there is no imbalance in the economic life of the people because of concentration of wealth in the hands of the few.
It does not mean attainment of economic equality but removal of side economic disparity. It implies the right to work and right to a decent living, on liberty essay. It also includes other benefits like sickness insurance, old age pension, unemployment insurance, etc. It is linked with the theory of one nationality, one state. It implies that every nation must have a right of self-determination. It may mean freedom from the foreign rule or creation of a on liberty essay sovereign state by each nation.
By exercising this liberty India became independent from the control of the British imperial power. By dint of similar right Bangladesh became an independent sovereign country by severing herself from Pakistan. Essay 3. Behind the law there is the sovereign authority of state. If law is violated, on liberty essay, the violator is punished. There are two opposite views on the relation between liberty and law. On liberty essay to the individualists, law or authority is detrimental to the individual personality of man.
John Stuart Mill and William Godwin are the chief exponents of the individualist theory. Mill had no hesitation that laws of the state are clear infringement of the liberty of the individuals.
So long as on liberty essay liberty of an individual does not hamper the liberty of other individuals there should be no authority to curtail the liberty of the former, on liberty essay. The extreme view is held by the anarchists who suggested that the state with all its legal system must be abolished. A contrary view is held by the idealists who want that the state should be all-powerful and the individuals must seek salvation through the state.
The individuals should be concerned with their duties to the state and must surrender all their liberties. It is the concern of the state to see to the well-being of the individuals. The state being an embodiment of morality stands on a higher footing than the individuals.
The individuals will get the due benefits within the state, not outside it. All individuals on liberty essay subordinate themselves to the ethical and social consciousness of the state. The two views mentioned above are exaggeration of facts. Individual liberty cannot be a wild buffalo.
The state is not to rope the freedom of individuals either. We must seek a via media. Both liberty and law must coexist. Law does not infringe the individual liberty. The idealist view that liberty lies in obedience to law is also not correct. The state exists for the all-round development of the society. If law is abolished there will be anarchy. In anarchy the liberty of the individual will not thrive, on liberty essay.
Law endures a social order and creates conditions for liberty. Liberty is the end of law. If law fails to protect individual liberty that law or authority is not good.
Essay 4. Safeguards of Liberty in a Modern State: Liberty is the finest fruit of human civilisation. So it is to be preserved. There are various instruments by which the individual liberty can be safeguarded.
Democracy as a form of government is most conducive to the growth of liberty, on liberty essay. This is considered the best form of government, because its main concern is to upkeep the freedom of the people. Without the opportunity of freedom there cannot be any liberty. It is, on liberty essay, therefore, seen that the liberty of an individual is best safeguarded in a democratic country like England and the USA. Without rights there cannot be liberty.
Some of the rights are considered basic and called the fundamental rights. In constitutions of some democratic countries these fundamental rights are incorporated and guaranteed.
It means that no authority can take away these rights. Thus the constitutions of the USA, France and India have enumerated these rights and guaranteed their protection. If these rights are inroaded by any authority, the individual can approach the courts of law. These fundamental rights are, therefore, some protective umbrellas over the individual liberty.
If the legislative, executive and judicial powers are combined in one person or one organisation there is scope for poaching on the individual liberty. So Charles-Louis Montesquieu and Sir William Blackstone pleaded for separation of powers, i. While there should be as much separation of power as possible it is not always practicable to have rigid separation of powers. Judiciary is one of the three organs of the government.
We have already noticed the good of separation of three organs of government. But the utmost importance is attached to the independence of the judiciary; it means that the executive or the legislature must not control or curb the power of the judges, on liberty essay. If the judges are independent, much of the abuses of the individual liberty may be avoided.
The independent as against committed judges help the protection of individual liberty.
On Liberty ~ Introduction [Illustrated]
, time: 10:44Liberty Essays: Examples, Topics, Titles, & Outlines
The subject of this Essay is not the so-called Liberty of the Will, so unfortunately opposed to the misnamed doctrine of Philosophical Ne-cessity; but Civil, or Social Liberty: the nature and limits of the power which can be legitimately exercised by society over the individual. A question seldom stated, and hardly ever discussed, in general File Size: KB “On Liberty” is an essay composed by a man named J.S. Mill who talks about the different types of liberty given to individuals. The novel in divided up into five chapter stating different liberties or responsibilities that makes someone a responsible self On Liberty In John Stuart Mill’s essay On Liberty, Mill states that individual liberty may be limited by only one thing: the self-preservation of society and other individuals. To that end, man must retain the liberty to act and think as he so chooses, Estimated Reading Time: 3 mins
No comments:
Post a Comment